If a caller dials +868686868686, the following could happen:
- While dialing +868686868686, your smartphone tells you whom you are calling (with the information from 868686868686.tel).
- While the call gets connected, the .tel website 868686868686.tel of the callee could get opened simultaneously.
- If the number +868686868686 is busy, alternative numbers from the .tel could be offered.
- Specific content from the .tel could be pushed to the caller's smartphone display.
- A voice mail goes into the cloud (as redirected by the .tel) instead to the hardware of the callee at home.
- The call history could go into the cloud, too.
- The smartphone could offer to send an e-mail to the owner of 868686868686.tel instead of dialing +868686868686.
- TelFriends.tel can ask the caller if he wants to connect his own .tel with the .tel of the callee.
- Third-party providers could provide additional services based on your calls.
- Based
on the information on a .tel, the caller can get much additional
information (e.g. customized advertising, coupons, opening hours,
routing information).
Coupons require location sensitivity provided by geo location.
Name calling is just a joke, which might had prospective sense 8 to 7 years ago.
6B+
mobile phones + phone directory Embedded into each mobile phones, and
embarked vocal recognition just killed this idea which emerged at times
there where no mobile internet clear vision, neither friendly GUIs
on smartphones to manage embarked phone contacts, nor enough processing
power to support voice recognition.
So just put aside that
LochNessMonsterKillerApp quest concerning Joe public, as there are so
many ways of offering better lookalike usage with existing free or paid
products or Tools.
And large stake holders were polite in their answers to name calling new entrants :
"show
me your millions of customers/users with your TEL (or your
CallName) and then I will adapt my business for win/win (alt. to take
advantage or yours). But in the meantime, just continue to use
our traditionnal (regularly upgraded) numbering plans for calling" ,
and
honestly the 200K+ "TEL owners" (counting dormants porfolioed ones
several times) just show they could have been less less polite in their
answer.
CallName which was mentionned above , although FREE,
based on App download, and supposedly somehow viral once you enter your
friends directory into the app, has only...... 234 likes on Facebook
!!!!
Therefore do not loose time on this side of the moon, whom finger it is showing the moon.
On
the other side of this moon, there are already in the sky new galaxies
with Facebook already with 1B+ users and testing social calling, Skype
with 200M+ is a reality ,not to mention Viber and others, or captive MM+
of Facetime users or BBM users, .... or billions of incumbant mobile
users.
So if one of these stake holder is going to go
extend "Name calling" to a large scale from what they already offer
commercially or test now, it might look like .... social calling and
social calling plans (offensive or defensive).
So IMHO , it is
dangerous to rely on exploring tiny paths when there are already growing
highways direct to your intended destination with growing trafic on
them...better try to build the right car to speed correctly on these
highways !!!
So either one finds some smart usage delivering added value
(confort, ease of use, cheaper call, voice messaging, etc BUT adding
value) a very simple and intuitive way using capabilities of TELs ( so
not an enthusiastic geek vision, but a base dow to earth short
sighted vision of millions of Joe public), that self propagates
and build such standalone MM+ users base, .....
or more
reasonnably ... try to use already existing MM+ users bases from Fbook,
BBRY, 2.75GSM etc, to leverage introduction of a new service or a new
application complementing what does exist already and based on TEL DNS.Otherwise, change your destination/plan .
Of
course on enterprise segment, one could still dream about name calling,
we should say brand calling (small business are unknown names so you
cannot go name calling, you have to go for search or for directory , so
easier move for Joe public whatever results).
Brand calling does
exist already the traditionnal way (1-800-vanity ) ... and new comers
would have to speak fluently marketing & branding and afford
marketing campaign costs to grab some market shares whatever the
underlying technology.
And eventhough, traditionnal Brand calling can be soon be bypassed by solutions with higher added value delivered on final goal,
which is mobile local shop discovery ( as a distributor of some famous brand)
and mobile purchasing/booking/prepaying with coupons or mobile money IN-store,
the next battle field after the now mature business model of online e-commerce .That
is why Paypal, Fbook, Google, Apple & others are all pushing their
last meter solutions these weeks/months, fishing with beacons for IRL
local shops discovery from mobile, to try to turn the table upside down
and cash in over walled gardens conscientiously tidied by banks and
credit card operators.
In this picture Telname pre packed TEL as well
as bare TELs as a cheap/easy/fast central point of contact/discovery
for local shops, can still play a role towards this solutions (to be
defined) because of the initial positionning at Icann level of TEL as a
central point of contact, whatever fuzzy pictures comes
out to mind through the TEL tracks record so far.
Of course you can do that with a dot com.
But
Joe public has already tried to connect to a dot com website from his
mobile or to search from Google on his mobile and he is not getting what
he is looking for, at this time.
And for the apps, Joe public is
still not fully interested nor in fact understand about mobile apps
either , needing too much trouble and education/marketing upon his
side and are at first sight too complex regarding what he feels are
only basic questions/needs.
So why not TEL ? it is easier to
Paypal Fbook Google or any other OTT, based on the size of their
users, to ask (or even request ) free of charge to TELnic to do some
move to retrofit TELs with some additionnal features or appropriate
pitch positionning .
It might be possible for them to discuss the
same way with dotMobi, but might be more costly and less pure vanilla
picture compared to initial pitch delivered by dot mobi at Icann and
engraved into hundreds of DN registrars .
So inventing or
encouraging new usage of TEL sticking to Joe public mobile or Joe public
social daily use and needs simplifying his digital life in his
respective communities or circles, would bring more benefits than
dreaming of bare name calling,
ALTHOUGH LONG NUMBERS are available to register soon from TELnic, which is supposedly the purpose of this collection of threads about long number registering (but never said "longPHONEnumber TEL registering only ) .