Chrome

Contents

1. 1 How to reach the Chrome WebRTC team
2. 2 How do I contribute code?
3. 3 Chrome WebRTC Quality Dashboard
4. 4 Chrome implementation details
   1. 4.1 Can I use the microphone input from GetUserMedia for local playback?
   2. 4.2 Can you summarize the evolution of the PeerConnection API changes? 
   3. 4.3 Data Channels?
   4. 4.4 TURN?
   5. 4.5 OPUS?
   6. 4.6 Recording?
   7. 4.7 DTMF support?
   8. 4.8 Internet Explorer?

How to reach the Chrome WebRTC team

For any questions, comments or stories you would like to share, please join our discussion list or engage us on Google+.

For specific issues with the code, please use our issue tracker:

http://code.google.com/p/webrtc/issues

Press enquiries should be sent to press@google.com

How do I contribute code?

We welcome external contributors! Go here if you are interested. Or, you can just download the code and play around with the samples to get started. The quality dashboard will tell you what the project's current status is.

Chrome WebRTC Quality Dashboard

The Chrome WebRTC quality dashboard can be found here.

Chrome implementation details

Both getUserMedia and PeerConnection are implemented and shipping in the desktop version of Chrome for Windows, Linux and Mac. These APIs do not require any flags or command line switches to use as they are now part of Chrome Stable.

Here are some frequently asked questions about the current implementation:

Can I use the microphone input from GetUserMedia for local playback?

No, the

Can you summarize the evolution of the PeerConnection API changes? 

 There have been many changes. Here is a little history and background and the latest (Oct 1st 2012, Chrome M23).

1. The first implementation of PeerConnection API was changed to webkitDeprecatedPeerConnection and the latest implementation webkitPeerConnection00  was introduced. This reason for this is detailed in a blog post but, in short, we switched from a ROAP based signalling mechanism to JSEP.
2. webkitDeprecatedPeerConnection was removed and replaced by webkitPeerConnection00.
3. The W3C made further significant changes, including a naming convention change. Chrome M23 introduces RTCPeerConnection. Since this is what will be shipping in Chrome, we have moved webkitPeerConnection00 behind a flag. Here is what we have implemented in Chrome:

We have implemented http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-webrtc-20120821/

with these two APIs:

    void        createAnswer (RTCSessionDescriptionCallback successCallback, optional RTCPeerConnectionErrorCallback? failureCallback = null, optional MediaConstraints constraints = null);

    void        updateIce (optional RTCConfiguration? configuration = null, optional MediaConstraints? constraints = null);

instead of :

    void        createAnswer (RTCSessionDescription offer, RTCSessionDescriptionCallback successCallback, optional RTCPeerConnectionErrorCallback? failure Callback = null, optional MediaConstraints constraints = null, optional boolean createProvisionalAnswer = false);

    void        updateIce (optional RTCConfiguration? configuration = null, optional MediaConstraints? constraints = null, optional boolean restart = false);

Data Channels?

An initial implementation can be found in Chrome v25. While the API matches the standard, please be aware that the actual network bits flowing over the network do not match the spec, and that a special flag and constraint parameter must be given.

To enable DataChannels in Chrome  M25 there are several things you need to do:

- Start Chrome with the flag --enable-data-channels

- When a peerconnection is created you need to create it with the  constraints RtpDataChannels.

servers = {iceServers:[{url:"stun:stun.l.google.com:19302"}]};

peerConnection = new webkitRTCPeerConnection(servers, { optional:[ { RtpDataChannels: true } ]});

- Only unreliable data channels are supported. To Create a data channel:

dataChannel = peerConnection.createDataChannel("a label", { reliable : false });

- After a data channel has been created-  an offer and an answer must be exchanged with the remote peer. Same as when a MediaStream has been added or removed.

Knows issues (except for the above limitations):

DataChannels never transit to Open state if it is created when audio an video is already flowing

TURN?

TURN support has been introduced in Chrome 24.

OPUS?

OPUS audio codec support was introduced in Chrome 24.

Recording?

Recording does not have a stable specification yet and our current focus is on PeerConnection. A draft of this API was posted in 2012. It can be found here.

DTMF support?

An initial, no guarantee given estimate is Chrome v26.

Internet Explorer?

WebRTC support for Internet Explorer has been tested on Chrome Frame for Internet Explorer users in non-metro

Aranda Ribera del Duero Raid Goum Nuñez casas rurales aranda hostales baratos aranda hostales aranda Casa Rural Tubilla del Lago

WebRTC efforts underway at Mozilla!

Last week, a small team from Mozilla attended IETF 83 in Paris, and we showed an early demo of a simple video call between two BrowserID-authenticated parties in a special build of Firefox with WebRTC support. It is still very early days for WebRTC integration in Firefox, but we’re really excited to show you something that works!

At Mozilla Labs, we’ve been experimenting with integrating social features in the browser, and it seemed like a cool idea to combine this with WebRTC to establish a video call between two users who are signed in using BrowserID (now called Persona). The SocialAPI add-on, once installed, provides a sidebar where web content from the social service provider is rendered. In our demo social service, we show a “buddy list” of people who are currently signed in using Persona.
The video chat page that is served when the user initiates a video chat uses a custom API intended to simulate the getUserMedia and PeerConnection APIs currently being standardized at the W3C. A is used to render both the remote and local videos, though it is also possible to render them in a . We’re working very quickly to implement the standard APIs, and you can follow our progress on the tracker bug.
A lot of folks burned the midnight oil to get this demo ready before the IETF event, and special thanks are due to Eric Rescorla, Michael Hanson, Suhas Nandakumar, Enda Mannion, Ethan Hugg, the folks behind Spacegoo, and Randell Jesup, in addition to the whole media team here at Mozilla.
Current development is being done on a branch of mozilla-central called alder. It is going to be an exciting few months ahead as we work towards bringing WebRTC to Firefox. There is a lot of work to do, and if you are interested in contributing, please reach out! Maire Reavy, our product person and project lead for WebRTC would be happy to help you find ways to contribute. Many of us are also usually available in IRC at #media, and we have a mailing list.

Transcript of screencast:
Hi, I’m Anant from Mozilla Labs and I’m here at IETF where we are demonstrating a simple video call between two BrowserID-authenticated parties, using the new WebRTC APIs that we are working on.
This is a special build of Firefox with WebRTC support, and also has the experimental SocialAPI add-on from Mozilla Labs installed. On the right hand side you can see web content served by demosocialservice.org, to which I will sign with BrowserID. Once I’m signed in, I can see all my online friends on the sidebar. I see my friend Enda is currently online, and so I’m going to click the video chat button to initiate a call.
Here, I see a very early prototype of a video call window served up by our demo social service. Now, I can click the Start Call button to let Enda know that I want to speak with him. Once he accepts the call, a video stream is established between the two parties as you can see. So, that was a video call built entirely using JavaScript and HTML!
You can check out the source code for this demo, as well as learn how to contribute to the ongoing WebRTC efforts at Mozilla in this blog post. Thanks for watching!

16 comments

Post a comment

1. Tod Robbins wrote on April 3rd, 2012 at 9:55 am:

   Exciting stuff! What is the roadmap for WebRTC-enabled Nightly/Aurora builds?
   

   Reply
   1. Anant Narayanan wrote on April 3rd, 2012 at 10:09 am:

      We have a goal to get basic WebRTC support in Nightly by the end of this quarter. It might just be support for getUserMedia and not the full PeerConnection, but we will move as fast as we can!
      https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2012-Q2-Goals#Video
      

      Reply
      1. Forrest O. wrote on April 10th, 2012 at 3:07 am:

         Nice. Will the PeerConnection stuff work for any kind of data?
         

         Reply
         1. Anant Narayanan wrote on April 14th, 2012 at 4:05 pm:

            Yes, the data API currently being discussed at the W3C will support both binary & text, as well as unreliable and reliable datagram support.
            

            Reply
2. Caspy7 wrote on April 5th, 2012 at 10:20 am:

   I wonder, might this integrate well with Apache Wave?
   

   Reply
3. CCAC (Collaborative for Communication Access via Captioning) wrote on April 9th, 2012 at 12:04 am:

   Integrate real time speech to text of high quality and you get the prize! :-)
   cheers, ls/ccac
   

   Reply
4. Stephan wrote on April 9th, 2012 at 7:40 am:

   Great work is the connection between the two browsers P2P?
   Thanks
   

   Reply
   1. Anant Narayanan wrote on April 9th, 2012 at 10:11 am:

      Yes, the default is to establish a P2P connection but if one could not be created (because of Firewalls etc.) the webapp has an option to use a proxy.
      

      Reply
5. Andrew Ducker wrote on April 9th, 2012 at 10:09 am:

   This is fantastic. I do wonder whether it would be possible to break this out into it’s own application, but using the Mozilla runtime.
   I like my IM app to be able to open its own windows, pop things up by itself, etc. without necessarily interrupting my browsing. If it’s all running inside a Firefox window then that’s going to be tricky to manage.
   

   Reply
   1. Anant Narayanan wrote on April 9th, 2012 at 10:16 am:

      It sounds like you’d want to make your IM app a full “webapp” using the apps infrastructure we’re working on. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Apps has an overview on how to do that, once you have a manifest and a user installs your app it will run in its own window, and you will be able to send out notifications, open pop ups etc.
      

      Reply
6. gt2rs wrote on April 14th, 2012 at 3:41 pm:

   Hey, so if it is P2P, over public IP’s there should be no need of 3rd party server, right? I wonder because Ericsson first released their webrtc in ubuntu, and it required webserver as a middle man atleast to initiate the call, subsequently chrome came up with webrtc and that too requires a server setup to manage the peer connection and it’s initialization.
   Now i wonder what is the status with this mozilla’s test app, because considering a scenario where both parties are directly accessable, there really should not be a need for a 3rd party server, i would be interested to know the status with mozilla’s solution?
   

   Reply
   1. Yaniv wrote on June 5th, 2012 at 1:25 am:

      You need a way of transferring the sdp to the other side, so you must have some kind of a web socket that both users are connected to.
      

      Reply
7. Debbra wrote on May 15th, 2012 at 9:12 am:

   When do you expect WEB RTC be ready for deployment with Firefox? Can you please provide me with an expected date?
   Thank you
   

   Reply
8. Sam Dutton wrote on July 12th, 2012 at 7:06 am:

   Great stuff. How is the video stream communicated in this prototype?
   

   Reply
9. majid khosravi wrote on August 17th, 2012 at 3:55 pm:

   Great, do you think there is a chance that something similar comes as a standard for HTML 5?
   Also is video peet to peer in this sample or does it require a server to run?
   

   Reply
10. Pravesh wrote on August 18th, 2012 at 3:28 am:

    Sounds great that we would be able to use WEB RTC, but if it is using HTML5 then would help a lot

 

Mozilla demos WebRTC integration, browser-powered video chat (video)

---

Last week at IETF 83 in Paris Mozilla gave a little demo that went almost completely unnoticed. The team behind Firefox showed off an experimental built of its flagship browser with integrated WebRTC support. To showcase the real-time communication plug-in's capabilities, the foundation built a simple video chat client based around Persona and SocialAPI. Whether or not such a feature will ever make it into an official build of the browser remains to be seen, but for now you can check out the simple, yet impressive, HTML and Javascript demo after the break.

Via:TechCrunch
Source: Mozilla Hacks


castrojeriz Trueque libros casas rurales aranda casas rurales covarrubias burgos casas rurales burgos libros ilustrados

 

Chrome to gain plug and play gamepad support and WebRTC video chat in 2012

---

Seems like Big G updates its browser of choice with fresh features every time we turn around, and one of Google's own, dev advocate Paul Kinlan, revealed that another spate of upgrades are arriving for Chrome early next year. The headliner is plug-and-play support for gamepads, but native support for cameras, microphones and open-source video chat framework WebRTC are on the docket too -- features that give Chrome some considerable gaming chops when combined with its existing WebGL and HTML 5 prowess and, he says, could bring OnLive to the web without plugins. If you thought Angry Birds on a browser was a great, we can't wait to see what's in store when a proper controller and integrated video chat are involved 

WebRTC, la próxima revolución en las comunicaciones

Aunque no es un tema del que hayamos hablado mucho por aquí, es simplemente porque aún está en desarrollo y un gran número de personas (entre los que se encuentran varios colegas) están haciendo un gran esfuerzo en conseguir que este sistema evolucione por el camino correcto aportando su grano de arena (o algún puñado grande) en definir las reglas correctas para que todo funcione como debería.

WebRTC es un sistema con el que podemos conectar el micrófono, la webcam y los altavoces al navegador y hacer uso de ellos estableciendo conexiones que nos permitan hacer conferencias y videoconferencias punto a punto de una manera mucho más accesible que utilizando un softphone.
WebRTC es un conjunto de estándares, de protocolos que se incluirán en HTML5 y Javascript, de forma que permiten capturar el streaming de audio y vídeo del micrófono y de la webcam, directamente a través del navegador y poder hacer con estos streaming lo que queramos.

Pero no es oro todo lo que reluce, (o no por ahora) y es que para poder hacer uso de este sistema es necesario que nuestro navegador web soporte no solo HTML5 (adiós Internet Explorer), si no también las aplicaciones necesarias para enviar y recibir streaming, algo que de momento parece que únicamente soporta la versión experimental de Chrome (Chromium Canary) aunque hace un par de semanas, el equipo de Mozilla ya avisó que este año Firefox soportará WebRTC y las pruebas realizadas parecen que van por muy buen camino.
WebRTC no es VoIP tal y como la conocemos, pese a que tiene la capacidad de enviar y recibir streams de audio y vídeo, para ello se utiliza códecs y protocolos propios basados en estándares abiertos, WebRTC NO SOPORTA SIP de forma nativa. La presentación sobre WebRTC de Iñaki Baz y Jose Luís Millán del VoIP2DAY 2011 presentó en exclusiva mundial una conversación SIP utilizando WebRTC, para lo que tuvieron que hacer uso de herramientas no pertenecientes al WebRTC, para establecer una comunicación SIP y utilizando WebRTC, “capturar” el audio entrante establecer una comunicación de VoIP más “estándar“.
Sin duda, WebRTC será la próxima gran revolución en las comunicaciones, permitiendo unir el audio y el vídeo con el navegador. Todavía es experimental, pero hay un gran trabajo ya hecho además del que se está realizando ahora mismo y que permitirá en un plazo muy corto de tiempo utilizar el navegador, no únicamente para ver páginas webs, si no como un sistema endpoint de comunicaciones.
Si estás interesado en descubrir qué es WebRTC, hay algunos enlaces que pueden serte útiles:

• WebRTC Homepage
• Google Chrome Canary + WebRTC support
• WebRTC Draft IETF (lista de distribución)
• Demos básicas de WebRTC (no funcionará si no es con un navegador que soporte WebRTC)
• Avances de Mozilla con WebRTC
• WebRTC en sistemas IOS de Apple

Save this on Delicious

For people like me who are wondering what .tel is good for, this is a great help:

A .tel domain is an innovative top-level domain (TLD) that allows using the DNS as a data store for contact information. Unlike traditional domains, .tel does not allow storage of Address or CNAME records; instead, a .tel domain can hold the following records:

TXT - Text string of 255 characters that can contain plain text, a system message, or a set of keyword value pairs like "tc" "London" (tc for Town/City)

LOC - Location record for storing the geographical coordinates as latitude, longitude and altitude with the accuracy of 6 decimal places

NAPTR - Naming Authority Pointer Record with contact information as a URI and an Enumservice that indicates the type of URL information, such as email or phone number
All Enumservice types are supported, and ordering and labelling are available

Other record types, such as SRV and MX

For example:



Telnic and other organizations maintain a proxy service and a number of other systems to enable adequate usage and representation of .tel data on the web and beyond.

For adequate storage, retrieval and display of this information, Telnic Ltd. has implemented a multi-level architecture consisting of the following levels:



For examples of software and services, see Ecosystem. This section focuses on the core software solutions.

Many more information are available at http://dev.telnic.org/pages/quick_start.html

How I can add new client with full permision to one folder?

How I can add new client with full permision to one folder?
www.telvision.co and www.telcp.com

You may try www.telcp.com.
Through TELcp you can invite your friends to manage telpages with their own credentials.

Create tel Owner account at www.telcp.com.
Add your tel domain.
Create folders.
Invite your friends to manage assigned tel pages without your help.

In TELcp tel Owners can manage multiple domains and multiple tel Users (your family members, friends etc).

More info at www.telcp.info & www.telcp.com.

It is FREE up to 2999 sub domains and any number of .tel Domains.

Charges will apply only if you want other parties to manage your tel pages (i.e. if you make arrangements, outside TELcp, for renting out sub domains etc).
However, you can still allow other parties FREE of charge up to 10 tel pages (tel Users) per .tel Domain.

Cheers! 

TelPowered Solutions
Launch delayed due to systems updates. Re-Launch expected before the end of January.

www.telpowered.tel
PO Box 1286
Columbia, SC 29202
United States of America
Tele: +1 800 435 3005
Fax: +1 800 420 3318




Copyright 2013, The Alliance. All rights reserved
“The Alliance” and The Alliance logo are service and trademarks registered in the United States and other nations of The Alliance.
"Telnic" and the .Tel logo are registered trademarks of Telnic, LTD in the UK and other nations of Telnic.
"Telnames" and the Telnames log are registered trademarks of Telnames, LTD in the UK and other nations of Telnames.

 

TelPowered Solutions

telpowered.tel

Datos de contacto

Primary Endpoint (Coming Soon)

www.telpowered.com

Mobile Ready Advertising

www.telads.tel

Enterprise Level Email

www.telmail.tel

Media Services and News (Coming Soon)

www.telpowered.tv

Telnames Registration EndPoint

www.telnames.com/?a_aid=telpowered

Email

admin@telpowered.com

Contacto principal Teléfono

+18037508855

Sociales y Mensajería

Twitter EndPoint

www.twitter.com/telpowered

Facebook EndPoint

www.facebook.com/telpowered

Pinterest EndPoint

www.pinterest.com/telpowered

.tel Mapping Tool

Friday, July 15th, 2011

You might have already seen this tool, which allows you to very easily embed .tel information on your website.
A couple of weeks ago a significant update was made to the .tel Mapping Tool, which displays .tel domains, sub-domains and related domains on a map in a very easy but modular way.
The previous version of the mapping tool allowed you to visualize a domain’s info in the “bubble” window in a single way:

But now with the latest update you can pass in a format for the bubble by using the parameter “info=”. The value of that parameter is a javascript snippet. The easiest explanation is through an example:
‘

’ + r['logo'] + ‘’ + r['dds'] + ‘
http://’ + domain + ‘” target=”_blank”>’ + idndomain + ‘

’ + r['firstnaptr'] + ‘’ The above gives the default bubble with the image on the left, and on the right the domain and the first contact record below it.
If you want to change it, note that this is a javascript string concatenation. It’s pretty clear what the params are:

• domain : the punycode domain
• idndomain : the unicode IDN domain (what you want to show to users)
• r : the result from the domain lookup, which has ‘logo’, ‘dds’ and ‘firstnaptr’, respectively the logo image, the title of your domain (dds), and the first naptr. All of those are actual html snippets.

If you want to pass in the ‘info=’ parameter using GET, you must escape the whole thing. And don’t forget to put single quotes at start and finish, like the example above.
If you use POST, you’re good to go.
Note that you can completely screw up the page if you pass in a broken javascript string, as it’ll break the whole javascript code on the page. You’ve been warned: with great power comes great responsibility…
The .tel Mapping tool also now supports all .tel IDN domain types (such as chinese character domains).
Should you want more detail on how to use the .tel Mapping Tool, please see the “Tools for Website Integrationl page.